a. Brutus says, "Let's be sacrifices, but nor butchers, Caius." Collect together the expressions
used by Brutus which are appropriate to butchery.
Brutus says some things that are related to butchery. "Let's carve him as a dish fit for the gods." is one of them, which indicates the carving of his body, instead
of chopping him up. "To cut the head off and then hack the limbs." is another one,
where he indicates the hacking of Ceasar's body, much like a butcher would an animal.
b. Brutus says that ideally they should be killing Caesar's spirit, not his body. Look up
the words of Caesar's ghost in Act IV Scene 3, lines 281, 282, and 284, and comment on the irony.
The irony is that they only killed Caesar's body, but not his spirit, when their intent
was to kill his spirit and not his body. Now, the living spirit lives on in order to haunt Brutus.
c. Brutus turns harsh words and phrases into softer ones, to make a savage act seem like a
civilized one. How does he choose his words to achieve this?
Brutus is constantly trying to change things to sound better, and more appropriate.
He does this by saying things such as "We all stand up against the spirit of
Caesar, and in the spirit of men there is no blood."
d. How is Brutus's dismissal of Antony consistent in expression with his earlier imagery?
His dismissal is an expression which indicates that he is trying to make the
murder of Caesar morally OK, even though he knows that it isn't
In groups of 4: Answer the following questions:
p. 223 #17, p. 226 #10, p. 230 #10
17. In his argument with Cassius in Act IV scene
3, Brutus refers to Caesar in terms of both praise and censure. Find the speech and decide whether:
a. the praise is consistent with earlier references
to Caesar’s qualities and
That he is an elder and more able soldier, that
Caesar durst not move.
b. whether the criticism is so major that Brutus
should have mentioned it earlier.
I think he should have mentioned it earlier because
now it is kind of after the fact, and it doesn’t mean as much to help things anymore.
10. The quarrel scene (Act IV Scene 2) has been
belittled by the critic Thomas Rymer in the seventeenth century; praised by John Dryden, his contemporary, for its “masculinity”
in the eighteenth century; admired as an example of dramatic genius in the nineteenth century (by Samuel Taylor Coleridge);
and dismissed as irrelevant by twentieth century critic Henry Bradley. Read it carefully and decide for yourself
a. Whether Brutus is (i) unrealistic in expecting
his allies always to act honorably or (ii) admirable in his inflexible attitude toward corruption.
He is admirable because there is obvious corruption
in the government from the death of Caesar and Brutus is the only one with the courage to say it.
b. Whether Brutus is (i) arrogant and insensitive
towards Cassius at the beginning of the quarrel or (ii) properly firm and uncompromising.
He is properly firm and uncompromising because Caesar was murdered and he knows it.
c. Whether Brutus is (i) taunts Cassius or (ii)
refuses to be browbeaten by him (Explain your answer)
He taunts him through the use of his explanation
to the crowd at Caesar’s funeral.
d. Whether Brutus is (i) insultingly cold or (ii)
admirable forthright
Brutus is admirablely forthright because
e. Whether Brutus is (i) sober form …”hides
wrongs” or (ii) whether he is “armed so strong in honesty” that he cannot compromise.
Form an opinion of your own about the character
of Brutus as it is revealed in the quarrel with Cassius from its beginning to its height. I think he is armed in honesty,
because he is honorable and firm in his thoughts, and won’t be tempted by simpler faster ways.
10. The quarrel scene (Act IV Scene 3) shows Cassius
in many moods.
a.
Choleric: what are the reasons for his anger, and are they justified? The reasons
for his anger are form some insults from Brutus, and they are justified.
b. Tormented: how does Brutus provoke him, and
what does Cassius’s restraint reveal about his personality?
c. Passionate: does the passion throw a new light
on his character? He says the one he loves, who is Brutus, his friend, which
makes us see a new side of him.
d. Affectionate: how does this show and is it
surprising?
e. Jocular: which episode brings out a flash of
humor, and what is its purpose?
f. Sympathetically emotional: would you have expected
him to react to Portia’s death in the way he does? How does it compare with Brutus’s own response?
g. Dependent: what evidence is there to show that
in his relationship with Brutus, there is another side to Cassius than the one presented before the assassination?
After finishing the questions, form groups of
3-4 and connect to the Internet. Identify the following parts of Julius Caesar and post it on your web sites: (Provide an
explanation of each stage ands where it occurs in the play. If you have problems remembering the terms, go to the top of the
page and follow the Greek Tragedy link for definitions.)
Hammertoe
Peritonea
Antagonisms
Catharsis
Character Essay
Connor Brown
Mr. Krucli
Eng. 2 e-core
27, May 2008
Julius Caesar
In our audio, my character is Julius Caesar, who is a strong willed, fiercely competitive, powerful man. In our audio we do the scenes from where Julius Caesar and his “friends” walk him to the senate,
and then the murder scene in which the conspirators end Caesar’s life.
Caesar is competitive in Rome,
because he had to be to gain power with the people and the senate. He doesn’t
trust skinny people because they aren’t content with their life, and they want more control. He doesn’t bother
with fat people because they are content with their lifestyle, and aren’t trying noir do they want to change anything
about their position.
He is strong willed, and isn’t a man to give up easily, or at all, which he proves when he is murdered, because
it seems as though her can pull through all the stabbing and blood right up to the point when his best, most trusted friend
stabs him. At that point, he seems to think that there is no other purpose to
like his life. With a last, famous line,”E tu, Brute?” he is dead,
pulling his cap over his head so that no one will se his defeated face.
He is a powerful man because of all the hard work he put into becoming that powerful man, making the connections, talking
to the right people, saying the right things to the people. He is a very witty
and cunning man, who would stop at nothing to get the one more vote of the people, or the last talk.
In conclusion, Julius Caesar is a great roman figure who has all the traits of a great hero, who gets stopped by his
best friend, the only one who gets in his way of total power, and making a Rome
even greater.